新学期课程持续更新中 · 免费领取学习建议 →
桃桃子英语乐桃优学开始学习 →
← 返回高中阅读
高中阅读理解

Critical Thinking in Digital Age

听完整文章,巩固老师整理的重点单词和短语。

阅读听读

统一使用清晰自然的英文女声,默认采用适合初中生听读的 0.75 倍速。

当前语速:0.75×

完整文章

Can you tell fact from fiction online? In a digital world, few questions are more challenging than fighting misinformation. As an education researcher and former high school history teacher, I know that history class can stimulate critical thinking—but only if teachers and schools understand what it really means.

Some might consider critical thinking an ability that teachers can encourage. Or they might be referring to specific skills—for instance, that students should learn a set of steps to take to assess information online. Cognitive(认知的) scientists see critical thinking as a specific kind of reasoning that involves problem‑solving and making sound judgments. It can be learned, but it relies on specific content knowledge.

Since context is key to critical thinking, learning to analyze information about current events likely requires knowledge about politics and history, as well as practice at tracing sources. Fortunately, that is what social studies classes are for.

Social studies researchers often describe this kind of critical thinking as “historical thinking”: a way to evaluate evidence about the past and assess its reliability. In social studies classrooms, students can make relatively quick progress on some of the surface features of historical thinking, such as learning to check a text’s date and author.

Social studies classrooms can also build what researchers call “civic online reasoning”. Fact‑checking is complex. It is not enough to tell young people that they should be careful online, or to trust sites that end in “.org” instead of “.com”. Rather than learning general principles about online media, civic online reasoning teaches students specific skills for evaluating information about politics and social issues.

Therefore, the solution lies not in teaching critical thinking as a separate skill, but in preserving and strengthening traditional social studies education that combines background knowledge with analytical capabilities. Only then can we effectively prepare students to distinguish truth from fiction in our digital world.

知识点积累

老师整理的重点单词和短语,可逐条播放或连续播放。

critical thinking

批判性思维

reasoning

/ˈriːznɪŋ/

n. 推理;推论

principle

/ˈprɪnsəpl/

n. 原则;准则

trustworthy

/ˈtrʌstwɜːði/

adj. 值得信赖的

trace

/treɪs/

v. 追溯;追踪(n.)

assess

/əˈses/

v. 评估;评价

dismiss

/dɪsˈmɪs/

v. 不予考虑;摒弃

unreliable

/ˌʌnrɪˈlaɪəbl/

adj. 不可靠的

solution

/səˈluːʃn/

n. 解决办法

highlight

/ˈhaɪlaɪt/

v. 突出,强调 (首字母h)

emphasize

/ˈemfəsaɪz/

v. 强调;着重 (首字母e)

technique

/tekˈniːk/

n. 技巧;方法

misinformation

/ˌmɪsɪnfəˈmeɪʃn/

n. 错误信息;不实消息

stimulate

/ˈstɪmjuleɪt/

v. 激发;刺激

specific

/spəˈsɪfɪk/

adj. 特定的;具体的

cognitive

/ˈkɒɡnətɪv/

adj. 认知的

involve

/ɪnˈvɒlv/

v. 包含;涉及

judgment

/ˈdʒʌdʒmənt/

n. 判断;判断力

analyze

/ˈænəlaɪz/

v. 分析

politics

/ˈpɒlətɪks/

n. 政治

fortunately

/ˈfɔːtʃənətli/

adv. 幸运地

evaluate

/ɪˈvæljueɪt/

v. 评估;评价 (首字母e)

reliability

/rɪˌlaɪəˈbɪləti/

n. 可靠性

relatively

/ˈrelətɪvli/

adv. 相对地

complex

/ˈkɒmpleks/

adj. 复杂的

preserve

/prɪˈzɜːv/

v. 保护;保存

strengthen

/ˈstreŋθn/

v. 加强;巩固

analytical

/ˌænəˈlɪtɪkl/

adj. 分析的;善于分析的

capability

/ˌkeɪpəˈbɪləti/

n. 能力;才能

effectively

/ɪˈfektɪvli/

adv. 有效地

distinguish

/dɪˈstɪŋɡwɪʃ/

v. 区分,区别(首字母d)

咨
询